Jeffrey Paul Baumgartner - the most original thinker in creativity & innovation today


Share Facebook Twitter Google LinkedIn Pintarest StumbleUpon Email     Follow me Follow me on Facebook Follow me on Twitter


Recent Articles



Articles by Theme

 


Two ballons  floating in the sky;

 

 

Anticonventional Thinking and Implementation

One of the problems with brainstorming and its more formalised offspring, creative problem solving (CPS), is that while it has specific rules for generating lots of ideas, it is vague when it comes to the process of choosing one or more ideas to develop. As a result, the action taken at the end of a brainstorm is often a vague vote for the "best idea". Sadly, in most companies, government offices and other organisations, the best idea is not the most creative1 (see also article above). Moreover, voting for the best idea only creates a democratic trend towards the safest, most conventional, most familiar ideas2,3. Indeed, if you want to choose the most creative ideas to develop at the end of a brainstorm, I suspect you would have better results if you asked participants which ideas they would least like to implement. My guess is that this would identify the most creative ideas -- however, this is only guess.

As result of this vagueness, too many brainstorms and related idea collection initiatives result in a pot of unacted-upon ideas. Likewise, many companies' suggestion scheme and idea management software contain databases full of ideas that have not been developed further. At workshops and conferences, I sometimes ask the audience how many of them have participated in a brainstorm -- almost everyone's hand goes up. If I then ask how many of those brainstorms resulted in highly creative ideas being implemented, very few hands remain standing. Sometimes none.

If There Is Only One Idea...

In anticonventional thinking (ACT) which focuses on developing a big idea -- rather than lots of little ideas -- this is less of a problem. By questioning, debating, criticising and improving the big idea during the ideation phase, there is no need to select ideas at the end of the session. Moreover, the final step in ACT requires that participants prepare a step-by-step action plan defining what needs to be done to implement the idea and who should take charge off that step4. The result: people leave the event with a big idea for achieving a goal together with a list of steps they need to take in order to make it happen.

Proponents of brainstorming argue that it is only by generating lots of ideas that we can find the most creative idea. They say that by focusing on a single solution (or a very small number of solutions), ACT may cause us to miss out on a much more creative idea. My argument is twofold. Firstly, their argument is based on an assumption. I know of no tests demonstrating that more ideas are necessary for a higher level of creativity. Secondly, if the aim of an ideation event is to achieve a creative goal (solve a problem with creativity), then an implemented idea is far more valuable than 100 creative ideas stuck to a whiteboard or sitting in a database.

Moreover, ACT emulates more closely the way highly creative people like artists, writers, composers and research scientists work. They seldom do "brainstorming" in its traditional sense. For example, a group of scientists trying to find a cure for a specific condition will gather a lot of information; formulate a single hypothesis (rather than a lot of ideas) often through argument and debate; and prepare an action plan to test the hypothesis. If their experiment does not work, they learn from it, revise their hypothesis and try again. A theatre group wanting to stage a performance of Romeo and Juliet will discuss, argue and play with various ways to present the play until they settle on a particular theme. For example, they might decide to stage it in a modern, urban environment. Then they will build up ideas about scenery, scene setting, costumes and so on. Then various members of the group take responsibility for tasks (the director details each scene, the costume designer starts designing costumes, etc) In my experience, such creative collaborations do not brainstorm for lots of ideas and choose the best idea. Rather they have a creative discussion that eventually settles on a particular approach. Once this is set, it is developed through more ideas. Finally, when the concept becomes sufficiently solid, people take responsibility and get to work.

Compare

Consider that drama group and compare it to the last brainstorm you participated in. The drama group will inevitably perform Romeo and Juliet using ideas they built up during their preliminary conversation. What happened to the ideas submitted at your brainstorm?

If you want a creative thinking approach that leads to action, ACT is far more likely to succeed than brainstorming.

References

  1. V S Gerlach, Schutz, Baker, Mazer, (1964) "Effects of Variations in Test Directions on Originality Test Response", Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol 55 No 2, pp 79-84.
  2. “Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market”; by
    Matthew J. Salganik,1,2* Peter Sheridan Dodds,2* Duncan J. Watts; Science 311, 854 (2006); DOI: 10.1126/science.1121066 (http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/311/5762/854.pdf -- PDF document)
  3. “Collaborative Fixation: Effects of Others’ Ideas on Brainstorming” by Nicholas W. Kohn1* and Steven M. Smith; Applied Cognitive Psychology; 29 March 2010 (http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/123329584/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0)
  4. F. de Sousa (2012) "What if you change IWWMI into WASNT?" http://www.jpb.com/creative/wasnt.php?subject_code=1

 



More Articles


Diagram of how value is added
Value+Innovation=Success
The mistake a lot of creative would-be entrepreneurs make is that they believe they only need to have a good idea and the ability to realise it in order to launch a successful business. -- Read the article...



employee fires CEO
How To Make Your Big Company Super-Innovative in One Easy Step
If a company really wants to become an innovation powerhouse, there is one simple action they can take: fire the CEO and hire a new one with a focused vision. -- Read the article...



Cartoon of woman holding mirror to self
How To Be Awesome In 7 Steps
So, you want to be awesome? Or, perhaps you recognise that you are awesome already, but want the rest of the world to know about it. Here is how to do it! -- Read the article...



cartoon: artist in office
Not Being Creative Boosts Creativity
In spite of all the noise about the importance of creativity, it is ridiculous to think you need to be creative all the time. -- Read the article...



Cartoon: sad guy walking past happiness poster
Happiness Is Overrated
There is a lot of pressure on people to be happy these days. That is not necessarily a good thing. -- Read the article...



Cartoon: searching for his passion
If You Cannot Find Your Passion, Create One
A lot of people are desperately seeking a passion. Sometimes it is better to create one instead -- Read the article...


 


 

 

Hire Me

I am available to do talks, workshops and consulting on a wide range of issues related to corporate creativity and innovation.

Interested? Learn more!

 

 

 

Bookcover: Anticonventional Thinking by Jeffrey Baumgartner

Anticonventional Thinking - the book - is out now!


 

Jeffrey speaking about anticonventional thinking at TEDx conference in Brussels

Hire Me

Creativity workshops & keynote speeches especially for you & your colleagues.

Learn more...

 


 

The Way of the Innovation Master, my book on implementing an innovation process in an organisation like yours.



Voted Number One Innovation Blogger in 2013!


 

Brussels Imagination Club Logo

Jeffrey is also the co-founder of The Brussels Imagination Club. Meet him there on the 2nd & 4th Wednesdays of the month.

 

 


 

jpb.com logo

j p b . c o m

Erps-Kwerps (near Leuven & Brussels) Belgium